Le 22/07/2014 17:44, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> > As for 2.x, I don't see why you couldn't just continue using a strong reference. As Antoine says, if the cycle already exists in Python 2 (and it sounds like it does), we can just skip backporting the weak reference change.
No, IIRC there shouldn't be a cycle. It's just complicated in a different way than 3.x :-)
Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
