On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think this thread is probably Python-Ideas territory...
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Allen Li <cyberdup...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Currently, this works with explicit line continuation, but as all style
> > guides favor implicit line continuation over explicit, it would be nice
> > if you could do the following:
> >
> > with (open('foo') as foo,
> > open('bar') as bar,
> > open('baz') as baz,
> > open('spam') as spam,
> > open('eggs') as eggs):
> > pass
>
> The parentheses seem unnecessary/redundant/weird. Why not allow
> newlines in-between "with" and the terminating ":"?
>
> with open('foo') as foo,
> open('bar') as bar,
> open('baz') as baz:
> pass
>
That way lies Coffeescript. Too much guessing.
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
