Le 17/08/2014 20:08, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On 18 Aug 2014 09:57, "Barry Warsaw" <ba...@python.org <mailto:ba...@python.org>> wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2014, at 09:12 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > >I'm talking more generally - do you *really* want to be explaining that > >"bytes" behaves like a tuple of integers, while "bytes.bytes" behaves like > >a tuple of bytes? > > I would explain it differently though, using concrete examples. > > data = bytes(...) > for i in data: # iterate over data as integers > for i in data.bytes: # iterate over data as bytes > > But whatever. I just wish there was something better than iterbytes. There's actually another aspect to your idea, independent of the naming: exposing a view rather than just an iterator.
So that view would actually be the bytes object done right? Funny :-) Will it have lazy slicing? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
