> > On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > Donald Stufft wrote: > >> My biggest problem with ``python3``, is what happens after 3.9. > > Python2 technically includes 1.x versions as well, so it > wouldn't be unprecedented for python3 to imply versions > beyond 3.x. It would be a bit confusing, though.
My problem isn’t that it *includes* it, it’s that either people have to go through the mess to update all of their things to ``python4`` at some point in the future, or Python 3.x will need to eventually mean ``python``. Well that or Python 4.x has a ``python3`` binary. --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com