> On Oct 29, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29 October 2014 20:26, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: >> This sounds like something good for packaging.python.org > > Yeah, I wondered about that. I'll work up a patch for that. But the > more I think about it, it really is trivial: > > - For non-free MSVC, install the appropriate version, and everything just > works. > - For Python 2.7 (32 or 64 bit), install the compiler for Python 2.7 > package and everything just works as long as you're using setuptools. > - For 32 bit Python 3.2-3.4, install Visual Studio Express and > everything just works. > - For 64 bit Python 3.2-3.4, install the SDK, set some environment > variables, and everything just works. > - For Python 3.5+, install the current Visual Studion Express and > everything just works. > > (I propose to deem Python 2.7 without setuptools as "unsupported") > > The only things I can see that need expansion are: > > 1. The precise versions to use (trivial to add, I'm just to lazy to > check right now). > 2. Where to get VS 2010 Express (as it's no longer supported or > available from MS). > 3. How to set up the SDK environment for 64-bit Python 3.2-3.4. > > Before I do a write-up, I want to set up clean VMs with these > configurations, so that I can confirm the details. But I don't expect > any problems, as I've done them all before. > > Paul.
I think it’d be good even if considered trivial. I know I certainly have no idea which pieces I needed to do that. --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
