No, that was a figure of speech. The proposed decorator returns a new function object that references a new code object. The original function and code object are unchanged.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> > wrote: > > The design just copies the code object with one flag set differently. > Code > > objects are immutable but they can be copied (though the interface to do > > that is kind of hidden). > > Yes, but the proposal as written spoke of replacing the generator > *function*, which has broader consequences. If it's simply replacing > the __code__ attribute of that function, it ought to be safe, I think? > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
