On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:10 PM, matthieu bec <m...@gmto.org> wrote:
> I wonder if the datetime module is really the right location, that has > constructor(year, month, day, ..., second, microsecond) - with 0<ms<999999, > no millis. adding 0<ns<999 would seem quite ugly, in fact nothing looks > quite right. We can make nanosecond a keyword-only argument, so that time(1, 2, 3, nanosecond=123456789) -> 01:02:03.123456789 and time(1, 2, 3, 4, nanosecond=123456789) -> error Users will probably be encouraged to avoid positional form when specifying time to subsecond precision. I would say time(1, 2, 3, microsecond=4) is clearer than time(1, 2, 3, 4) anyways. Another option is to allow float for the "second" argument: time(1, 2, 3.123456789) -> 01:02:03.123456789
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
