Thanks for taking a look. I looked at inspect and I can't see anything that needs to change since it's the caller rather than the receiver who has more options after this PEP. Did you see anything in particular?
Best, Neil On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Walter Dörwald <wal...@livinglogic.de> wrote: > On 20 Jan 2015, at 17:34, Neil Girdhar wrote: > > > My question first: > > test_ast is mostly generated code, but I can't find where it is being > > generated. I am pretty sure I know how to fix most of the introduced > > problems. Who is generating test_ast?? > > > > Update: > > > > So far, I've done the following: > > > > Updated the patch to 3.5 > > Fixed the grammar to accept final commas in argument lists always, and to > > work with the already implemented code. > > Fixed the ast to accept what it needs to accept and reject according to > the > > limitation laid down by Guido. > > Fixed the parsing library. > > > > Fixed these tests: > > test_ast.py > > test_extcall.py > > test_grammar.py > > test_syntax.py > > test_unpack_ex.py > > > > As far as I can tell, all I have left is to fix test_ast and possibly > write > > some more tests (there are already some new tests and some of the old > > negative tests expecting SyntaxError are now positive tests). > > inspect.signature might need an update. > > Servus, > Walter >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
