On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:22:20 -0800 Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 01/26/2015 12:09 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:06:26 -0800 > > Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > >> It destroy's the chaining value and pretty much makes the improvement not > >> an improvement. If there's a possibility that > >> the same key could be in more than one of the dictionaries then you still > >> have to do the > >> > >> dict.update(another_dict) > > > > So what? Is the situation where chaining is desirable common enough? > > Common enough to not break it, yes.
Really? What are the use cases? > > Not every new feature warrants a syntax addition - especially when it > > raises eyebrows as here, and ends up being as obscure as Perl code. > > Not sure what you mean here -- the new feature is a syntax addition That's what I said. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
