On 11 February 2015 at 15:45, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Antoine Pitrou wrote: >>>>> >>>>> bytearray(b"a") + b"bc" >> >> >> bytearray(b'abc') >> >>>>> b"a" + bytearray(b"bc") >> >> >> b'abc' >> >> It's quite convenient. > > > It's a bit disconcerting that the left operand wins, > rather than one of them being designated as the > "wider" type, as occurs with many other operations on > mixed types, e.g. int + float. > > In any case, these seem to be special-case combinations. > It's not so promiscuous as to accept any old iterable > on the right:
Binary concatenation accepts any bytes-like object (aka buffer API implementing type), and it's the fact that both bytes and bytearray interoperate with any bytes-like object that results in the "left operand wins" behaviour when you use them together. I don't believe we deliberately designed it that way, it's just an inherent consequence of having both types implement concatenation based on the buffer protocol rather than using any kind of type check. If we *had* tried to define one of the two as encompassing the other, then we would have also run into http://bugs.python.org/issue11477 Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
