On 15 February 2015 at 19:23, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Paul Moore <p.f.moore <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> 2. It would be a nice, although extremely obscure, feature to be able >> to allow people who want to keep Python off their path to set >> VIRTUAL_ENV but *not* set PATH, so that py.exe does the right thing >> but there's *still* no python.exe on PATH. Limit the dependency on a >> single environment variable rather than two, in other words. > > If this is the case, then your patch may not work if PATH isn't set. If a > shebang is found in a script, it is processed in maybe_handle_shebang(), which > means that your code to look in a venv won't be hit (though if you rely on the > PATH being correctly set, then it will work as expected because the handling > for e.g. /usr/bin/env python searches the PATH).
Yes, when I was actually coding this, I backed down on this (I updated the PEP accordingly). Now, running py.exe with no script will pick up VIRTUAL_ENV, but when you run a script, you need the virtualenv to be activated for this to work. The original PEP said nothing about a PATH search for #!/usr/bin/env python, so I mistakenly assumed there was no way currently to write a script that worked with an activated virtualenv. When I found that the code did this, I decided it was unnecessary to add extra tests and complexity just to cater for a case that nobody was ever likely to need. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
