On 21.03.15 13:46, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 19:28, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
Here is list of my ready for review patches. It is incomplete and contains
only patches for which I don't expect objections or long discussion. Most
of them are relative easy and need only formal review. Most of them wait
for a review many months.
It's worth noting that If there are changes you feel are genuinely low
risk, you can go ahead and merge them based on your own commit review
(even if you also wrote the original patch).
Yes, but four eyes are better than two eyes. I make mistakes. In some
issues I hesitate about documentation part. In some issues (issue14260
and issue22721) I provided two alternative solutions and need a tip to
choose from them. While I am mainly sure about the correctness of the
patch, I'm often hesitate about the direction. Is the bug worth fixing?
Is the new feature worth to be added to Python?
Thanks Alexander, Amaury, Benjamin, Berker, Demian, Éric, Ethan, Martin,
Paul, Victor and others that responded on my request.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
