On 04/03, Greg Ewing wrote: > On 04/03/2015 02:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> If I'm understanding PJE's main concern correctly it's that this >> approach requires explicitly testing that the decorator has been >> applied correctly in your automated tests every time you use it, as >> otherwise there's a risk of a silent failure when you use the >> decorator but omit the mandatory base class that makes the decorator >> work correctly. > > Could the decorator be designed to detect that situation > somehow? E.g. the first time the decorated method is called, > check that the required base class is present. That feels like a horrible work-around. The proper place for setup code is in the set up. -- ~Ethan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
