On 04.04.2015 02:49, Donald Stufft wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 04.04.2015 00:14, Steve Dower wrote:
>>> The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives, 
>>> except everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one who 
>>> has admitted to using GPG on Windows :)
>>>
>>> Basically, what I want to hear is that GPG sigs provide significantly 
>>> better protection than hashes (and I can provide better than MD5 for all 
>>> files if it's useful), taking into consideration that (I assume) I'd have 
>>> to obtain a signing key for GPG and unless there's a CA involved like there 
>>> is for Authenticode, there's no existing trust in that key.
>>
>> Hashes only provide checks against file corruption (and then
>> only if you can trust the hash values). GPG provides all the
>> benefits of public key encryption on arbitrary files (not just
>> code).
>>
>> The main benefit in case of downloadable installers is to
>> be able to make sure that the files are authentic, meaning that
>> they were created and signed by the people listed as packagers.
>>
>> There is no CA infrastructure involved as for SSL certificates
>> or Authenticode, but it's easy to get the keys from key servers
>> given the key signatures available from python.org's download
>> pages.
> 
> FTR if we’re relying on people to get the GPG keys from the download
> pages then there’s no additional benefit over just using a hash
> published on the same page.

Well, it's still better than just the hashes...

> In order to get additional benefit we’d need to get Steve’s key
> signed by enough people to get him into the strong set.

...but having the key signed by fellow core devs will certainly
add more goodness :-)

>> If you want to sign a package file using GPG, you will need
>> to create your own key, upload it to the key servers and then
>> place the signature up on the download page.
>>
>> Relying only on Authenticode for Windows installers would
>> result in a break in technology w/r to the downloads we
>> make available for Python, since all other files are (usually)
>> GPG signed:
>>
>> https://www.python.org/ftp/python/3.4.3/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Marc-Andre Lemburg
>> eGenix.com
>>
>> Professional Python Services directly from the Source
>>>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
>>
>>
>>   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
>>    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
>>           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
>>               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> Top-posted from my Windows Phone
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: M.-A. Lemburg<mailto:m...@egenix.com>
>>> Sent: ‎4/‎3/‎2015 10:55
>>> To: Steve Dower<mailto:steve.do...@microsoft.com>; Larry 
>>> Hastings<mailto:la...@hastings.org>; Python 
>>> Dev<mailto:python-dev@python.org>; 
>>> python-committers<mailto:python-committ...@python.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] Do we need to sign Windows 
>>> files with GnuPG?
>>>
>>> On 03.04.2015 19:35, Steve Dower wrote:
>>>>> My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have 
>>>>> an
>>>>> opinion here. So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care 
>>>>> about
>>>>> GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care?
>>>>
>>>> The later replies seem to suggest that they are general goodness that 
>>>> nobody on Windows will use. If someone convinces me (or steamrolls me, 
>>>> that's fine too) that the goodness of GPG is better than a hash then I'll 
>>>> look into adding it into the process. Otherwise I'll happily add hash 
>>>> generation into the upload process (which I'm going to do anyway for the 
>>>> ones displayed on the download page).
>>>
>>> FWIW: I regularly check the GPG sigs on all important downloaded
>>> files, regardless of which platform they target, including the
>>> Windows installers for Python or any other Windows installers
>>> I use which provide such sigs.
>>>
>>> The reason is simple:
>>> The signature is a proof of authenticity which is not bound to
>>> a particular file format or platform and before running .exes
>>> it's good to know that they were built by the right people and
>>> not manipulated by trojans, viruses or malicious proxies.
>>>
>>> Is that a good enough reason to continue providing the GPG
>>> sigs or do you need more proof of goodness ? ;-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marc-Andre Lemburg
>>> eGenix.com
>>>
>>> Professional Python Services directly from the Source
>>>>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>>>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>>>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
>>>
>>>
>>>   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
>>>    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
>>>           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
>>>               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> python-committers mailing list
>> python-committ...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> 
> ---
> Donald Stufft
> PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mal%40egenix.com
> 

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::


   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to