Le samedi 4 avril 2015, Ludovic Gasc <gml...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > From a user's point of view, it should count for the total time, IMO. >> If people want a timeout for each syscall, they should call send() >> iteratively. > > > I'm agree with Antoine for a global timeout. >
Ok, I also agree. I will modify sendall in Python 3.5 and suggest to loop on send to keep the same behaviour on timeout. I don't want to change python 3.4 or 2.7, it would be strange to have a different behaviour in a minor python version. Victor
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
