On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:16:19 +1000 Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > I could keep going, but I hope I've made my point.
I don't think so. Just because other languages are looking at it doesn't mean it will end up successful. It means it's an interesting idea, that's all. A litmus test for this PEP would be to apply it to a sizable code base and evaluate the results. Looking at isolated function examples doesn't tell us how it will scale (and I'm obviously not talking about performance, but the ability to still give useful diagnostics in the presence of typing "holes" - i.e. untyped functions - or imprecisions, when factored in a complex graph of call dependencies). > Whatever language you > are using in 5-10 years time, it will almost certainly be either mostly > static with some dynamic features like Java, or dynamic with optional > and gradual typing. Anybody can make predictions. As a data point, 6 years ago people were predicting that the average desktop CPU would have 16 cores nowadays... (we don't hear much from them anymore :-)) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
