Yury Selivanov writes: > To my eye 'async def name()', 'async with', 'async for' look > better than 'def async name()', 'with async' and 'for async'. > But that's highly subjective.
I'm with Barry on this one as far as looks go. (But count that as a +0, since I'm just a literary critic, I don't use coroutines in anger at present.) > I also read "for async item in iter:" as "I'm iterating iter > with async item". I thought that was precisely the intended semantics: item is available asynchronously. Again, count as a +0. FWIW, etc. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
