Paul Moore wrote:
On 24 April 2015 at 09:34, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
cocall await(cocall f(x))
That doesn't look so bad to me.
I've not been following this discussion (and coroutines make my head
hurt) but this idiom looks like it's bound to result in people getting
the idea that you scatter "cocall" throughout an expression until you
get it to work.
They won't need to do that, because they'll get told
exactly where they've left one out, or put one in that
they shouldn't have.
Also, the places you need to put cocall are exactly
the same as the places you need yield-from currently,
or await under PEP 492.
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
