I prefer option #3.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I don't want this: "await a() * b()" to be parsed, it's not meaningful.
>
> Likely you'll see "await await a()" only once in your life, so I'm fine to
> use parens for it (moreover, I think it reads better with parens)
>
> Yury
>
>
> On 2015-04-27 8:52 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>>
>> Yury Selivanov wrote:
>>>
>>> I've done some experiments with grammar, and it looks like
>>> we indeed can parse await quite differently from yield. Three
>>> different options:
>>
>>
>> You don't seem to have tried what I suggested, which is
>> to make 'await' a unary operator with the same precedence
>> as '-', i.e. replace
>>
>> factor: ('+'|'-'|'~') factor | power
>>
>> with
>>
>> factor: ('+'|'-'|'~'|'await') factor | power
>>
>> That would allow
>>
>> await a()
>> res = await a() + await b()
>> res = await await a()
>> if await a(): pass
>> return await a()
>> print(await a())
>> func(arg=await a())
>> await a() * b()
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/andrew.svetlov%40gmail.com
--
Thanks,
Andrew Svetlov
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
