On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nathaniel, > > On 2015-04-29 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> What I do feel strongly about >> is that whatever syntax we end up with, there should be*some* >> accurate human-readable description of*what it is*. AFAICT the PEP >> currently doesn't have that. >> > > How to define human-readable description of how unary > minus operator works? > In a PEP you should probably give grammar that is not the actual grammar from the implementation, but matches the grammar used in the reference manual on docs.python.org. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
