On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:32:02 -0700 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > No, this is the name we've been using since PEP 342 and it's still the same > concept.
The fact that all syntax uses the word "async" and not "coro" or "coroutine" hints that it should really *not* be called a coroutine (much less a "native coroutine", which both silly and a lie). Why not "async function"? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
