On 2015-08-27 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Maybe asyncio should just be kept provisional during 3.5, with a separate promise to remain backward compatible?

I'm +1.

I'm also certain that by 3.6.0 we will stabilize asyncio to the point we can freeze it like any other stdlib module.

Yury

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to