On 16 Sep 2015 18:48, "Paul Moore" <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 16 September 2015 at 06:10, Stephen J. Turnbull <step...@xemacs.org> wrote: > > The only thing that hg really lost badly on > > IMO was "named branches", and that's been fixed with bookmarks. > > FWIW, I still find bookmarks confusing to use compared to git > branches. I don't know whether that's because bitbucket doesn't > support them well,
It's BitBucket - their PR system for Mercurial primarily relies on named branches rather than bookmarks. Gory details: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/6705/cant-create-pull-request-from-hg-bookmark Regards, Nick.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
