On Sep 16 2015, "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
> The DAG plus git branches-as-labels *fits in my head* in a way that the
> DAG plus named-branches-and-other-things does not.
Hmm, that's odd. As far as I know, the difference between the hg and git
DAG model can be summarized like this:
* In git, leaves of the DAG must be assigned a name. If they don't have
a name, they will be garbage collected. If they have a name, they are
called a branch.
* In hg, leaves of the DAG persist. If you want to remove them, you
have to do so explicitly (hg strip), if you want them to have a name,
you must do so explicitly (hg bookmark). A node of the DAG with a
name is called a bookmark.
* hg named branches have no equivalent in git.
Does that help?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
