On 22 October 2015 at 19:12, Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com> wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 1:09 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
>> But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't.
>
> Or bR (which is currently allowed) but not fbR in the future.
My own objection isn't to allowing "fR" or "fbR", it's to allowing the
uppercase "F".
I also don't understand why we can't say "if 'f' is part of a string
prefix, it must be first".
That would mean we kept the current 14 combinations:
['B', 'BR', 'Br', 'R', 'RB', 'Rb', 'U', 'b', 'bR', 'br', 'r',
'rB', 'rb', 'u']
And added only 13 more possibilities, being a lowercase 'f' prefix on
its own, and as a prefix for the various b/r combinations:
['fB', 'fBR', 'fBr', 'fR', 'fRB', 'fRb', 'fb', 'fbR', 'fbr', 'fr',
'frB', 'frb']
I don't think it would ever be worth the compatibility break to
require lowercase for 'rbu', or to enforce a particular relative order
(although those could be good pylint rules, if they aren't already),
but there's no such restrictions for the new 'f' prefix.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
