2015-11-04 21:14 GMT+01:00 Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de>: > Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython?
If I understood correctly the first feedback on python-ideas, there were mostly positive, so I believe that it would be possible to merge the FAT mode into CPython. The changes required to implement the FAT mode are restricted to a few files and are small. But I would prefer to keep the whole "FAT mode" optional, to keep exactly the same performances than before for the "standard" mode. I will write a PEP for that, but first I have to ensure that FAT Python works as expected (it's really faster), and that it's generic enough to be used by projects like Numba, Cython, pythran, etc. (but not JIT-based interpreters like PyPy or pyston which already have their own efficient guards.) Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
