On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Stewart, David C <david.c.stew...@intel.com> wrote: > On 12/1/15, 10:56 AM, "Maciej Fijalkowski" <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>Hi David. >> >>Any reason you run a tiny tiny subset of benchmarks? > > We could always run more. There are so many in the full set in > https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ with such divergent results that it seems > hard to see the forest because there are so many trees. I'm more interested > in gradually adding to the set rather than the huge blast of all of them in > daily email. Would you disagree? > > Part of the reason that I monitor ssbench so closely on Python 2 is that > Swift is a major element in cloud computing (and OpenStack in particular) and > has ~70% of its cycles in Python.
Last time I checked, Swift was quite a bit faster under pypy :-) > > We are really interested in workloads which are representative of the way > Python is used by a lot of people and which produce repeatable results. (and > which are open source). Do you have a suggestions? You know our benchmark suite (https://bitbucket.org/pypy/benchmarks), we're gradually incorporating what people report. That means that (Typically) it'll be open source library benchmarks, if they get to the point of writing some. I have for example coming django ORM benchmark, can show you if you want. I don't think there is a "representative benchmark" or maybe even "representative set", also because open source code tends to be higher quality and less spaghetti-like than closed source code that I've seen, but we're adding and adding. Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
