On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Emanuel Barry <vgr...@live.ca> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan made a pretty elaborated blog post about that here: > http://opensource.com/life/14/9/why-python-4-wont-be-python-3 > I wholeheartedly agree with what Nick writes there -- but I can't resist noting that the title is backwards -- the whole point is that Python 4 *will* be like Python 3, i.e. it will *not* differ (in a backward-incompatible way) from Python 3. What Nick probably meant is "Why the *transition to* Python 4 won't be like the transition to Python 3." And that is exactly right. We've learned our lesson (though we're in much better shape than Perl :-). -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
