Can look at it. There has been a lot of discussion, iirc, between
OpenSSL and LibreSSL re: version identification.
Thx for the reference.
On 08-Mar-16 14:55, Hasan Diwan wrote:
On 8 March 2016 at 00:49, Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl
<mailto:mich...@felt.demon.nl>> wrote:
As a relative newcomer I may have missed a long previous
discussion re: linking with OpenSSL and/or LibreSSL.
In an ideal world this would be rtl linking, i.e., underlying
complexities of *SSL libraries are hidden from applications.
In short, when I saw this http://bugs.python.org/issue26465 Title:
Upgrade OpenSSL shipped with python installers, it reminded me I
need to start looking at LibreSSL again - and that, if not already
done - might be something "secure" for python as well.
According to the libressl website, one of the projects primary goals
is to remain "backwards-compatible with OpenSSL", which is to say, to
either have code work without changes or to fail gracefully when it
uses the deprecated bits. It does seem it ships with OpenBSD. There is
an issue open on bugs to address whatever incompatibilities remain
between LibreSSL and OpenSSL[1]. Perhaps you might want to take a look
at that? -- H
1. https://bugs.python.org/issue23177
Michael
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org <mailto:Python-Dev@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/hasan.diwan%40gmail.com
--
OpenPGP: http://hasan.d8u.us/gpg.asc
Sent from my mobile device
Envoyé de mon portable
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
