On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:03:36 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <step...@xemacs.org> wrote: > R. David Murray writes: > > > again. However, the IPV4 address has a poor reputation, and Verizon > > at least appears to be blocking it. So more work is still needed. > > Don't take Verizon's policy as meaningful. Tell Verizon customers to > get another address. That is the only solution that works for Verizon > subscribers for very long (based on 15 years of Mailman-Users posts), > they have never been a high-quality email provider. Further, Verizon > (as an email provider) is in the process of dying anyway (they are > very much alive as the new owner of AOL), so improvements in their > email practices have a likelihood of zero to the resolution of a C > float.
Yes, Mark reminded me that Verizon still isn't accepting mail from mail.python.org, despite multiple contacts from the postmaster team. So they are pretty much a lost cause and no one should use them for email, I think. However, the "poor reputation" comment came from the error message returned by gmail when it bounced the spam-bounce-reports bugs was trying to send to Ezio. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
