Chris Angelico wrote:
-1 for __os_path__, unless it's reasonable to justify it as "most of the standard library uses Path objects, but os.path uses strings, so before you pass a Path to anything in os.path, you call path.ospath() on it, which calls __os_path__()".
A less roundabout interpretation would be that it returns the path in a form that is directly acceptable to the OS. BTW, if __fspath__ is acceptable, __ospath__ (without the embedded _) should be as well. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
