On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 13:40 Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > On 10.04.2016 16:51, Paul Moore wrote: > > On 10 April 2016 at 15:07, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > >> If there's some agreement to change things with respect to those 5 > points, I > >> am willing to put some time into it. > > In broad terms I agree with these points. Thanks for doing the > > research. It would certainly be good to try to improve pathlib based > > on this sort of feedback while it is still provisional. > > I'd appreciate some guidance on this. Just let me know what I can do > since I don't know the processes of hacking CPython. >
https://docs.python.org/devguide/ and https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-mentorship are your friends. :) For new features of a module you can discuss it on python-ideas first before proposing a patch if you're worried a patch implementing the feature might get rejected and you don't want to risk wasting your time. -Brett
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
