On 04/17/2016 02:05 PM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
On 04/17/2016 06:58 AM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
So, as a summary: With a str+bytes-polymorphic __fspath__, with the
above argumentation and the rough implementation of os.fspath(...),
the conclusion is that the os.fspath function should indeed be public,
and that no further variations are needed.
Nice summation, thank you. :)
Come on, Ethan, that summary was not for you ;)
Heh.
You can do better than that: read the whole thing! ;-).
Ah, but I did read the whole thing! I just didn't want to quote it all
and then add one line, so I snipped the rest.
Let me try again:
Good, well thought-out post. Thank you. :)
if-at-first-you-don't-succeed'ly yrs,
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
