On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 09:07 Thomas Heller <thel...@ctypes.org> wrote:
> Am 11.05.2016 um 18:04 schrieb Brett Cannon: > > > > > > On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 04:35 Thomas Heller <thel...@ctypes.org > > <mailto:thel...@ctypes.org>> wrote: > > > > Am 10.05.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Brett Cannon: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 May 2016 at 01:18 Martin Panter <vadmium...@gmail.com > > <mailto:vadmium%2...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:vadmium%2...@gmail.com <mailto:vadmium%252...@gmail.com>>> > > wrote: > > > > > > I am working on <https://bugs.python.org/issue22636>, to fix > shell > > > injection problems with ctypes.util.find_library(). The > > proposal for > > > Python 3 is to change os.popen(shell-script) calls to use > > > subprocess.Popen(). > > > > > > However the Python 2.7 version of the module has a comment > > which says > > > “This file should be kept compatible with Python 2.3, see PEP > > 291.” > > > Looking at <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0291/>, it is > not > > > clear why we have to maintain this compatibility. My best > guess is > > > that there may be an external ctypes package that people > > want(ed) to > > > keep compatible with 2.3, and also keep synchronized with 2.7. > > > > > > > > > That's correct and the maintainer is/was Thomas Heller who I have > > cc'ed > > > to see if he's okay with lifting the restriction. > > > > For me it is totally ok to lift this restriction. > > > > > > Great! I'll also update PEP 291. > > Cool. While you're at it, the compatibility restriction for > modulefinder could also be lifted. > Will do.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
