On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Cons: > (3) Polymorphic code that truly doesn't care whether it gets bytes or > str will have a slightly less convenient way of getting it, namely by > calling __fspath__() itself, instead of os.fspath().
I don't like this; it goes against the general principle that dunders are for defining, not calling. Generally, a given dunder method has approximately one call site, eg __reduce__ in pickle.py, and everyone else defines it. (You might call super's dunder in the definition of your own, but that's still defining it, not calling it.) Having an official statement that it's appropriate to call a dunder confuses this. So this isn't a "slightly less convenient way", it's a bad way (IMO), and this is a very strong con. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
