> On 13 May 2016, at 08:07, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > > On 05/12/2016 01:59 PM, Sjoerd Job Postmus wrote: >>> On 12 May 2016, at 21:30, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >>> >>> If you need bytes support for your paths, there's at least one [1] that has >>> that support. >> >> So if I would need bytes support, I should submit a pull request to >> <arbitrary but awesome > > library> which replaces usage of the stdlib pathlib with another variant, > > upon which they > > will decline the pull request because it introduces another "useless" > > dependency. > > My apologies, I thought you were talking about your own code. > > As far as <arbitrary but awesome library> -- it wouldn't be awesome to me if > I couldn't pass in the data types I need. > > -- > ~Ethan~
I just hope you are right. Thank you (and Brett) for clearing things up for me. My apologies if I came off as (a bit) harsh. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
