On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 6/7/2016 1:51 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > >> Note: just to be clear, this PEP is *not* about changing > >> ``type.__dict__`` to ``OrderedDict``. > > By 'type', do you mean the one and one objected named 'type or the class > being defined? To be really clear, will the following change? > >>>> class C: pass > >>>> type(C.__dict__) > <class 'mappingproxy'>
I mean the latter, "type" -> the class being defined. > > If the proposal only affects (slows) the class definition process, and then > only minimally, and has no effect on class use, then +1 on being able to > avoid metaclass and prepare for its most common current usage. That is all correct. -eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
