On 06/09/2016 02:39 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 7 June 2016 at 20:17, Eric Snow wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
If __definition_order__ is supposed to be immutable as well as read-only
then we should convert non-tuples to tuples. No point in letting that
user bug slip through.
Do you mean if a class explicitly defines __definition_order__? If
so, I'm not clear on how that would work. It could be set to
anything, including None or a value that does not iterate into a
definition order. If someone explicitly set __definition_order__ then
I think it should be used as-is.
I'm guessing Ethan is suggesting defining it as:
__definition_order__ = tuple(ns["__definition_order__"])
When the attribute is present in the method body.
Yup, that it's it exactly. Thanks, Nick!
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
