I would be super excited for this feature, so if there's a reasonable chance of it being picked up I don't mind doing the implementation work.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Eric Snow wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Émanuel Barry <vgr...@live.ca> wrote: > > As stated by Guido (and pointed out in the PEP): > > > > Making **kwds ordered is still open, but requires careful design and > > implementation to avoid slowing down function calls that don't benefit. > > > > The PEP has not been updated in a while, though. Python 3.5 has been > > released, and with it a C implementation of OrderedDict. > > > > Eric, are you still interested in this? > > Yes, but wasn't planning on dusting it off yet (i.e. in time for 3.6). > I'm certainly not opposed to someone picking up the banner. > <wink-wink> > > > IIRC that PEP was one of the > > motivating use cases for implementing OrderedDict in C. > > Correct, though I'm not sure OrderedDict needs to be involved any more. > > > Maybe it's time for > > a second round of discussion on Python-ideas? > > Fine with me, though I won't have a lot of time in the 3.6 timeframe > to handle a high-volume discussion or push through an implementation. > > -eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
