[David Mertz] > OK. My understanding is that Guido ruled out introducing an os.getrandom() > API in 3.5.2. But would you be happy if that interface is added to 3.6? > > It feels to me like the correct spelling in 3.6 should probably be > secrets.getrandom() or something related to that.
secrets.token_bytes() is already the way to spell "get a string of messed-up bytes", and that's the dead obvious (according to me) place to add the potentially blocking implementation. Indeed, everything in the `secrets` module should block when the OS thinks that's needed. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
