On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 07/10/2016 08:32 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> >> wrote: >>> >>> (1) How much extra effort are we going to *mandate* that core devs put >>> in to hide the differences between C and Python code, for the benefit of >>> a small minority that will notice them? >>> >> >> The subject line is raising one specific difference: the use of a >> function in one version and a class in the other. I think it's not >> unreasonable to stipulate one specific incompatibility that mustn't be >> permitted. > > > Is that what the subject line meant? I missed that, thanks for pointing > that out! > > I think I can agree with having both versions being functions or both > versions being classes. >
What I mean is, the subject line is ONLY raising that one difference. If the C version of a class has no __dict__ but the Python version does, that's not as big a difference. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
