On 4 September 2016 at 00:11, Random832 <random...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016, at 18:06, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: > > I guess one reason I don't like bchr (nor chrb, really) is that they > > look just like a random sequence of letters in builtins, but not > > recognizable the way asdf would be. > > > > I guess I have one last pair of suggestions for the name of this > > function: bytes.chr or bytes.char. > > What about byte? Like, not bytes.byte, just builtins.byte. > I like this option, it would be very "symmetric" to have, compare: >>>chr(42) '*' >>>str() '' with this: >>>byte(42) b'*' >>>bytes() b'' It is easy to explain and remember this. -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
