On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 September 2016 at 19:59, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] >> >> Similarly, it would be reasonable to say that these three snippets >> should all be equivalent from a typechecking perspective: >> >> x = None # type: Optional[T] >> >> x: Optional[T] = None >> >> x: Optional[T] >> x = None > > > Nice idea, explicit is better than implicit. >
How is it going to help that these are equivalent within one checker, if the meaning may differ across checkers? -- Koos > -- > Ivan > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/k7hoven%40gmail.com > -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven + _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
