I found some time before beta 1 to modify the f-string code to implement the desired behavior: no backslashes inside the curly braces, but they're allowed in the literal string portions. I just checked it in.

I still need to update PEP 498, and the documentation needs updating. I'll create an issue for the docs once I've updated the PEP.

This is a fairly large change, because now I need to parse the f-strings in UTF-8, and do the decoding myself in pieces, instead of the previous behavior of decoding the string first and then parsing it.

I think I have tests for all of the backslash scenarios, but I'll watch the buildbots.

Eric.

On 8/30/2016 1:55 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
After a long discussion on python-ideas (starting at
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-August/041727.html)
I'm proposing the following change to PEP 498: backslashes inside
brackets will be disallowed. The point of this is to disallow convoluted
code like:

d = {'a': 4}
f'{d[\'a\']}'
'4'

In addition, I'll disallow escapes to be used for brackets, as in:

f'\x7bd["a"]}'
'4'

(where chr(0x7b) ==  "{").

Because we're so close to 3.6 beta 1, my plan is to:

1. Modify the PEP to reflect these restrictions.
2. Modify the code to prevent _any_ backslashes inside f-strings.

This is a more restrictive change than the PEP will describe, but it's
much easier to implement. After beta 1, and hopefully before beta 2, I
will implement the restrictions as I've outlined above (and as they will
be documented in the PEP). The net effects are:

a. Some code that works in the alphas won't work in beta 1. I'll
document this.
b. All code that's valid in beta 1 will work in beta 2, and some
f-strings that are syntax errors in beta 1 will work in beta 2.

I've discussed this issue with Ned and Guido, who are okay with these
changes.

The python-ideas thread I referenced above has some discussion about
further changes to f-strings. Those proposals are outside the scope of
3.6, but the changes I'm putting forth here will allow for those
additional changes, should we decide to make them. That's a discussion
for 3.7, however.

I'm sending this email out just to notify people of this upcoming
change. I hope this won't generate much discussion. If you feel the need
to discuss this issue further, please use the python-ideas thread (where
some people are already ignoring it!).

Eric.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eric%2Ba-python-dev%40trueblade.com


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to