On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:33 AM, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll improve OrderedDict after dict in 3.6 is stable enough.
+1 and if it's done carefully we could even utilize the pure Python OrderedDict and get rid of odictobject.c (and fold dict-common.h back into dictobject.c). We'd need to leave the current implementation as the fallback for implementations that don't have an ordered dict. However, we'd first try a compact-dict-based variant. Doing so would probably require a new field in sys.implementation that indicates dict is ordered. > Then, I'll do same to sets. Unless I've misunderstood, Raymond was opposed to making a similar change to set. -eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
