But they most certainly are documented! So Skip's point is valid. MvL's suggestion for how to evolve this API is still the best IMO.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Skip Montanaro <skip.montan...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Why didn't these flags >> (and the T_* flags in structmember.h) get swept up in all the hubbub >> around the grand renaming. > > > Note that structmember.h is semi-private - it is not included in Python.h. > See discussion at <http://bugs.python.org/issue2897>. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
