On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It absolutely *is* relevant, as is how diligent the redistributors are > in differentiating between the unmodified upstream project and the > patches we have applied post-release (rather than just posting the end > result without a clear audit trail). Distros don't do all that extra > work just for the fun of it - it's an essential part of keeping track > of who's ultimately responsible for which pieces in a way that's > transparent to recipients of the software. Ensuring we aren't taking > excessive liberties with the language definition is also one of the > reasons we sometimes seek explicit permission for deviations - it > documents that those particular changes still fit within the bounds of > what counts as "Python".
For clarification: By "we" in the above paragraph, you mean Red Hat, not the PSF, right? You have two affiliations. :) ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
