I submit an issue about it. See https://bugs.python.org/issue29178
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:38 PM, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thinking more about this, and after looking at my own code in asyncpg and >> uvloop, I'm now in favor of adding bytes.frombuffer() with the proposed >> signature: ``bytes.frombuffer(byteslike, length=-1, offset=0)`` >> > > Do you prefer a signature proposed first? > I thought it from asyncio usage too. Slicing from head of bytearray > is more common > than offset usage. > > But in previous thread, Serhiy and Victor proposed signature same to > old buffer API. > >> I like the idea with Serhiy's API (as Python 2 buffer constructor): >> >> bytes.frombuf(buffer, [offset, size]) >> bytearray.frombuf(buffer, [offset, size]) >> memoryview.frombuf(buffer, [offset, size]) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
