2017-03-10 0:35 GMT+01:00 Ned Deily <n...@python.org>: > I don't know exactly what you mean by an "official GO" but I don't think > there has been any agreement yet since there hasn't been a specific proposal > yet to review. I think what *was* agreed is that, in principle, translation > *sounds* like a good idea to follow up on elsewhere, i.e. on one of the > existing sigs, and then come back with a specific proposal for review. > Thinking about that a little more, I think the appropriate output of those > discussions should be a process PEP. Then we can review the proposal > properly and also have the process clearly documented for the future.
FYI we are already working on a PEP with Julien Palard (FR) and INADA Naoki (JP). We will post it when it will be ready ;-) Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
