Yep, interested in implementing it! I will put implementation time on my schedule and tell y'all when it is, for holding myself accountable -- it turns out I never do anything not on my schedule.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 30 May 2017 at 23:02, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >> >>> All in all I'm still leaning towards Naomi's original proposal -- it >>> looks simpler to implement as well. >>> >> >> OK, I think having a bit of verbosity is absolutely fine if we win >> simplicity of implementation (for both static and runtime purposes). >> > > Then I propose to do it this way. We can always add Jukka's way as an > alternative notation later. I'd like to hear from Jukka before I merge the > PR for PEP-484. > > In the meantime, Naomi, are you interested in trying to implement this? > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
